Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background: To reduce contagion of COVID-19, in March 2020 UK general practices implemented predominantly remote consulting via telephone, video or online consultation platforms. Aim: To investigate the rapid implementation of remote consulting and explore impact over the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design and Setting: Mixed-methods study in 21 general practices in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire. Methods: Quantitative: Longitudinal observational analysis comparing volume and type of consultations in April-July 2020 with April-July 2019. Negative binomial models were used to identify if changes differed amongst different groups of patients. Qualitative: 87 practice staff longitudinal interviews in four rounds investigated practices experience of the move to remote consulting, challenges faced and solutions. A thematic analysis utilised Normalisation Process Theory. Results: There was universal consensus that remote consulting was necessary. This drove a rapid change to 90% remote GP consulting (46% for nurses) by April 2020. Consultation rates reduced in April-July 2020 compared to 2019; GPs/nurses maintained a focus on older patients, shielding patients and patients with poor mental health. Telephone consulting was sufficient for many patient problems, video consulting was used more rarely, and was less essential as lockdown eased. SMS-messaging increased more than three-fold. GPs were concerned about increased clinical risk and some had difficulties setting thresholds for seeing patients face-to-face as lockdown eased. Conclusions: The shift to remote consulting was successful and a focus maintained on vulnerable patients. It was driven by the imperative to reduce contagion and may have risks; post-pandemic, the model will need adjustment.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948

Type

Journal article

Journal

BJGP

Issue

48

Publisher

BJGP

Publication Date

17/01/2021

Volume

9

Keywords

Research methods, Quality of life, Qualitative research, Research methods (other)