Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abstract Activity pacing aims to manage symptoms of chronic pain and improve function by modifying pain-related behaviours: avoidance, overdoing and overdoing-underdoing cycling. Research regarding the effectiveness of activity pacing is unclear, and hindered by the absence of a validated scale. The previously developed 28-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-28) comprises five domains: Activity adjustment, Activity planning, Activity consistency, Activity progression and Activity acceptance. This study aimed to shorten the APQ and provide evidence for its validity, reliability and responsiveness. Paper-based questionnaires collected data from patients with chronic pain attending healthcare services in England, UK, at baseline (n=347), and again at 2-weeks (n=130) and 12-weeks (n=121). Outcome measures included the APQ-28, and other measures of pacing, avoidance, overdoing, pain, self-efficacy, quality of life, physical/mental function, depression and anxiety. Statistical analyses explored validity, reliability, responsiveness and measurement error. Factor analysis (n=347) showed poor model fit for the previous five-factor model, leading to selecting a four-factor model (removing Activity acceptance) with three items per domain, forming the APQ-12 (CFI=0.995, TLI=0.992, RMSEA=0.052, SRMR=0.050). The four domains showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.70–0.84) and test-retest reliability (n=130, ICC=0.53–0.64). Only Activity consistency showed significant responsiveness (n=121, Rho=0.27, 95% CI=0.1–0.43). Measurement error of the APQ-12 domains included smallest detectable change (range=1.55–1.76), standard error of measurement (range=0.56–0.63) and minimally important change (range=-0.17–0.33). Confirmatory factor analysis on external data supported the four-domain structure (CFI=0.983, TLI=0.977, RMSEA=0.071, SRMR=0.106). The APQ-12 shows promise as a multi-domain measure of activity pacing for use in clinical practice and future research.

More information Original publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105568

Type

Journal article

Journal

The Journal of Pain Volume 37, December 2025, 105568

Publisher

Elsevier B.V.

Publication Date

03/10/2025

Addresses

This study was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research (Award ref:C075)

Keywords

Activity pacing, Scale validation, Chronic pain, Questionnaire