Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abstract Background In England, current practice is cancer antigen 125 (CA125) testing with pelvic ultrasound scan (USS) if CA125 is ≥35 U/mL for triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer (OC) in primary care. However, OC risk varies with CA125 level and age. The Ovatools model predicts OC risk based on age and CA125 levels to support primary care triage. Method We evaluated five alternative triage pathways for suspected OC in primary care, using a decision model. Two CA125-USS sequential pathways used Ovatools risk: 1-3% (subsequent USS) and ≥3% (urgent referral), or age-adjusted CA125 thresholds equivalent to Ovatools risks. Three pathways involved concurrent CA125-USS testing, with referral if abnormal USS or one of the following: (1) Ovatools risk ≥3%, (2) CA125 above the equivalent age-adjusted threshold or (3) CA125 ≥35U/mL. Clinical and cost-effectiveness was compared against current practice for women over and under 50 years of age. Results All alternative pathways increased benefits at age ≥50 years, at additional cost. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for CA125-USS sequential pathways were below 30,000 British pounds, dropping below 20,000 British pounds if the Ovatools threshold for USS was increased to 1.2-1.4% risk. Discussion For women ≥50 years, the Ovatools and equivalent age-adjusted threshold sequential pathways are cost-effective compared to current practice.

More information Original publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.31.25324934

Type

Journal article

Journal

Medrxiv

Issue

medRxiv 2025.03.31.25324934

Publication Date

15/04/2025

Addresses

This study/project is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research (project reference 629).