Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abstract This opinion piece emerged from a collaboration of mental health researchers working on the National Institute of Health Research 3-schools mental health programme in underserved communities. The aim is to encourage debate and reflection on the challenges encountered with university research ethics committees when undertaking qualitative research with vulnerable young people. We explore the tension between principles of safeguarding and protection of research participants, on the one hand, and the potential for this oversight to become obstructive and thus to effectively stifle the voices and experiences of an already marginalised population, on the other hand.

More information Original publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241306241

Type

Journal article

Journal

Qualitative Research, 0(0).

Publisher

SAGE Publications Inc

Publication Date

16/01/2025

Addresses

This paper is based largely on the experiences of fellowship students funded by the NIHR 3-schools mental health programme. Three NIHR Research Schools Mental Health Programme, (grant number MH015).