Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
  • 1 October 2015 to 30 June 2016
  • Project No: 270
  • Funding round: FR 9

Autistic people can experience difficulties in communication and interacting with others. This may be due to a lack of mainstream understanding about autism. While there is a lot of research around children and GPs, particularly around the diagnosis of autism, much less is known about adults’ experiences with their GPs. Good communication is central to good healthcare and it is important that GPs, and primary care staff, are able to communicate effectively with their autistic patients.

This study aims to understand what issues may impact on consultations involving GPs and primary care staff and their ‘high functioning’ autistic patients by identifying the facilitators and barriers patients experience to good communication. We have interviewed 36 autistic adults, who have given us permission to use their interviews for research. These interviews were conducted in a flexible way to allow participants to express themselves comfortably, for example, one interview was conducted via email.

We will code and analyse these interviews to identify what people describe as helping or hindering communication with their GPs. We will also run two focus groups, one with GPs and one with Practice Nurses, to discuss the findings and their implications. We will produce a brief resource of video clips and text illustrating these issues to publish at Healthtalk.org. We will also submit the findings to a peer reviewed journal, give a presentation at a primary care conference and pilot methods for a funding application on what good GP care looks like to a diverse range of patients.

Evidence synthesis working group

The collaboration will be conducting 18 high impact systematic reviews, under four workstreams.

Find out more