Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

  • 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2025
  • Project No: 733
  • Funding round: PPIE

Lead member: University of Southampton 

Introduction and aims 

Making sure that a wide range of people can take part in research is important so the results are relevant to everyone. However, some people, like those who are neurodivergent, face challenges when trying to join research studies. Some of the reasons for this are; 

  • Recruitment methods that are complicated 

  • Forms that are hard to read and understand 

  • Instructions that are difficult to follow 

To address these issues, we need to develop new, simpler and more inclusive ways to encourage participation.  We will be working with autistic people to tackle these challenges and believe the findings will be relevant to other neurodivergent people too. In Southampton, the PPIE and ‘Finding out Together’ team has created a successful approach called Listening Cafes. These are informal gatherings where they chat, do craft activities together, and build relationships with communities who are often not heard from. They have used this method successfully with individuals from different backgrounds, including those with lower incomes or diverse ethnicities. We believe this approach can be adapted to engage with autistic people by thinking about where the cafes will be held, how they will be run, and finding out what people prefer.   

This project aims to: 

  • Establish specialised Listening Cafes designed to suit the needs of autistic people, making them feel more included and engaged in research activities.  

  • Identify the main reasons why autistic people face difficulties in participating in research studies, using NIHR-HSDR-funded Phased-In study as an example. 

  • Develop improved methods so that more people from these groups can participate in Phased-In and other primary care research studies. 

 

Approach 

We will contact a community group who supports autistic people to understand what barriers they face to taking part in research. We will adapt the Listening Cafe modelOur approach will involve hosting up to four meetings/café events organised by the community group at their preferred locations. These events will focus on: 

  1. Building relationships and getting to know each other. 

  1. Finding out the best ways to work together.  

  1. Recognising the specific reasons why people do not take part in research. 

  1. Working together to find solutions to encourage people to take part in research.  

Drawing insights from the NIHR-HSDR Phased-In study, we'll improve our recruitment materials, such as creating easy-to-read documents, short videos, and infographics to make information more accessible.  

 

Outcomes 

Through this project, we aim to achieve the following outcomes: 

  • Develop sustainable and customised engagement strategies that can be shared with other primary care researchers and studies funded by the NIHR.  

  • Identify the main barriers to research participation and develop practical solutions that can be applied to different studies and research teams. 

  • Improve our recruitment materials for the Phased-In study to ensure fair participation opportunities for autistic people. 

 

Dissemination 

We will publish our findings in a PPI journal and present at research conferences. We will share summaries and videos with the community group and promote them widely on social media and on charity platforms. 

 

Amount awarded: £7773.59

Projects by themes

We have grouped projects under the five SPCR themes in this document

Evidence synthesis working group

The collaboration will be conducting 18 high impact systematic reviews, under four workstreams.